Indeed, homosexuality,
described by Murray and Roscoe as mostly a Western invention to suppress the
East, is largely accepted in Muslim societies as evidenced by the cultural
norms, though rarely spoken of publicly. “Done discreetly, one is able to
pretend that nothing has happened.” (Murray, 18) By this, he is suggesting that as long as you don’t fall from
grace and get caught in the act, your business is your business. This tolerance
only works if and when man continues “his family line and does not throw away
property indulging his vices.” This is so true. There’s also this dichotomy between role
functions of men and women within society. Whereas men are versatile and can
perform equally well in the bedroom as a top or bottom, women are only good for
one thing: that is procreation.
Comparably,
this concept of homosexuality is discounted by Najmabadi who doesn’t exactly
agree. While Murray describes it as sort of hush hush understanding in society
and “will not to know, ” ideology about homosexuality, Najmabadi says it was not unusual to
find people mention someone’s sexual preference when describing them. I found
this difference important for perspective. In addition to the pedestal little boys were placed on
by Islamic values, it’s impressive just how little is talked about women and
gender and sexuality . The one example where Murray talks about a owry of 15 pounds offered for a
pre-pubescent boy as a opposed to 1 pound gift for a girl, shows this inherent liking for boys as a
society and flagrant disregard for following western social norms.
No comments:
Post a Comment